The Financial and Economic Division of the High Court in Accra has released its full judgement detailing how former Chief Executive Officer of Microfinance and Small Loans Centre (MASLOC), Sedina Christine Tamakloe Attionu and Head of Operations, Daniel Axim were convicted.
The full judgement of the Court presided over by Justice Afia Serwah Asare-Botwe, a Justice of the Court of Appeal, who sat as an additional High Court judge sentenced each of the two convicts.
While Sedina Tamakloe was jailed for 10 years, Daniel Axim is to serve five years in addition to fines.
Below is the full details of Justice Asare-Botwe’s sentences on all the 78 Counts
NB: Sedina Tamakloe (A1). Daniel Axim (A2).
In sentencing A2 who is present, I have borne in mind that Al who is the main architect of this ignoble enterprise has managed to evade justice up to this point.
I have also noted that the Republic has done nothing, to the knowledge of this Court, to take advantage of international co-operation to bring her to justice.
A2 has to take the fall for A1 by his presence. That said, however, do not want to set a bad precedent by ignoring the fact that certain classes of public and civil servants are gatekeepers and can help safeguard the public purse fi they do their work faithfully.
The sentence against the accused persons also takes cognizance of the quantum of funds lost, the deliberation and enterprise with which the offences were committed and the fact that this type of white-collar crime is in the experience of this Court one too many.
The Court will therefore, to curtail crimes of this nature, hand down a deterrent sentence to deter would-be professional criminals from copying the actions of the accused.
1. Counts 1, 2,3,4, 15, 24, 25, 26,27, 28, 29 30, 31, 32, 33 34 and 35- on the charge of Stealing against A1 (Sedina Tamakloe).
2. Counts 5, 4, 9, 11,13, 16, 20 and 2- on the charge of Conspiracy to Steal against A1 and A2;
3. Counts 6,7;8,10, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21 and 23 on the Charge of conspiracy to steal and Stealing Against A1 and A2; Al is sentenced to 10 years (In hard labour). A2 is sentenced to 5 years (In hard labour). On the charges related to the offence of causing financial loss to the state and its inchoate.
4. On counts 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 47, and 64:- on the charge of Willfully Causing Financial Loss To The State Against A1.
5. On counts 43, 45, 48, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 61, 62, 65 and 67-: on the charge of Conspiracy to Willfully Cause Financial Loss to the State against A1 and A2.
6. On counts 44, 46, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 63, 66 and 68 on the charge of Willfully Causing Financial Loss to the State against Al and A2. A1 is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of three years and a fine of three thousand penalty units or in default an additional two years in hard labor. A2 is sentenced to a terms of twelve months and a fine of one thousand penalty units or in default another 12 months.
7. Counts 69,70 and 71 on Causing Loss to Public Property against Al. Al is sentenced to a custodial sentence of two years and to pay a fine of 500 penalty units or in default 12 months imprisonment.
8. Counts 72 and 73 on Improper Payment of Public Funds against A1. A1 is sentenced to a custodial sentence of six months on both counts
9. Count 74- Unauthorized Commitment Resulting in Financial Obligation for the Government against A1. A1is sentenced to a custodial sentence of six months
10. Counts 75 and 78 on the charge of Money Laundering against A1.
11. Counts 76 and 77 on the charge of Money Laundering against A1 and A2. A1 to three years IHL and two thousand penalty units or in default another two years. A2 to two years and five hundred penalty units or in default 12 months.
12. Counts 79 and 80 on Contravention of the Public Procurement Act against A1: A1 is sentenced to two years and a fine of one thousand penalty units or in default another twelve months imprisonment.
The sentences are to run concurrently
The Prosecution is directed to undertake forfeiture proceedings against the assets of the Al in particular who received substantially all the money lost to the State.
Find attached the full judgement
Source: Kasapafmonline.com /Murtala Inusah
